Ex-gang member wins murder appeal

p13450UK-News-10-1

Published: Tuesday 9th December 2014 by The News Editor

Comments (0)

A former gang member has won his appeal against his conviction for murder.

Dwaine George, now aged 30, was convicted of the 2001 shooting of 18-year-old Daniel Dale in Manchester, and jailed for life in 2002.

George, who always denied murder and maintained his innocence, was ordered to serve a minimum of 12 years behind bars and was released last year on a life licence.

Today Sir Brian Leveson, president of the Queen’s Bench Division, and two other judges quashed his conviction, saying it was “no longer safe”.

After a failed appeal in 2004, the Criminal Cases Review Commission(CCRC) referred the murder conviction to the Court of Appeal for a second time.

Mr Dale, who had never been in trouble with the police, was gunned down as he chatted with pals in the street and was found collapsed in an alleyway off Farnborough Road at Miles Platting, .

He was due to be called as a witness in a crown court trial into the killing of his friend Paul Ward, 16, who was stabbed to death in Cheetham Hill in January 2001 in what was a separate case.

Ex-gang member George, formerly of New Moston, was found guilty in April 2002 after a trial at Preston Crown Court of Mr Dale’s murder and charges of attempted murder and possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life.

Sir Brian Leveson, sitting with Mr Justice Green and Mr Justice Goss, expressed the court’s “gratitude” to the CCRC for the part it had played in the appeal.

He also paid tribute “to the work of the Innocence Project and Pro Bono Unit at Cardiff Law School, which took up the appellant’s case and pursued it so diligently”.

The judge described how the CCRC obtained its own scientific evidence and referred George’s case to the appeal court on the grounds that there was “a real possibility” that the evidence of gunshot residue “does not now attract the value attributed to it at trial, and therefore does not support the identification evidence”.

The CCRC also questioned the admissibility of voice identification evidence.

Published: Tuesday 9th December 2014 by The News Editor

Comments (0)

Local business search