CIA fights back over torture report

Published: Thursday 11th December 2014 by The News Editor

Comments (0)

The CIA and several of its past leaders are stepping up a campaign to discredit a five-year Senate investigation into the agency’s interrogation practices after 9/11.

They are concerned that the historical record may define them as torturers and expose them to legal action around the world.

The Senate intelligence committee’s report does not urge prosecution for wrongdoing and the Justice Department has no interest in reopening a criminal probe.

But the threat to former interrogators and their superiors was underlined as a UN special investigator demanded those responsible for “systematic crimes” be brought to justice.

Human rights groups also pushed for the arrest of key CIA and George W Bush administration figures if they travel overseas.

Current and former CIA officials pushed back, determined to paint the Senate report as a political stunt by Democrats tarnishing a programme that saved American lives.

It is a “one-sided study marred by errors of fact and interpretation – essentially a poorly done and partisan attack on the agency that has done the most to protect America,” former CIA directors George Tenet, Porter Goss and Michael Hayden wrote in the Wall Street Journal.

Mr Hayden was singled out by Senate investigators for what they said was a string of misleading or false statements he gave in 2007 about the importance of the CIA’s brutal treatment of detainees in thwarting terrorist attacks.

He described the focus on him as “ironic on so many levels” as any wrongdoing pre-dated his arrival at the CIA. “They were far too interested in yelling at me,” he said.

The intelligence committee’s 500-page release concluded that the CIA inflicted suffering on al Qaida prisoners beyond its legal authority and that none of the agency’s “enhanced interrogations” provided critical, life-saving intelligence.

It cited the CIA’s own records, documenting in detail how waterboarding and lesser-known techniques such as “rectal feeding” were employed.

The CIA is now in the uncomfortable position of defending itself publicly, given its basic mission to protect the country secretly.

Its 136-page rebuttal suggests Senate Democrats searched through millions of documents to pull out evidence backing up predetermined conclusions.

“That’s like doing a crossword puzzle on Tuesday with Wednesday’s answer’s key,” the CIA said.

Challenging one of the report’s most explosive arguments – that harsh interrogation techniques did not lead to Osama bin Laden – the CIA pointed to questioning of Ammar al Baluchi, who revealed how an al Qaida operative relayed messages to and from bin Laden after he departed Afghanistan.

Before then, the CIA said, it only knew that courier Abu Ahmad al Kuwaiti interacted with bin Laden in 2001 when the al Qaida leader was accessible to many of his followers. Al-Kuwaiti eventually led the US to bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan.

Pouring over the same body of evidence as the investigators, the CIA insisted most of the 20 case studies cited actually illustrated how enhanced interrogations helped disrupt plots, capture terrorists and prevent another 9/11-type attack.

The agency said it obtained legal authority for its actions from the Justice Department and White House, and made “good faith” efforts to keep congressional leaders informed.

Former CIA officials responsible for the programme echoed these points in interviews.

John McLaughlin, then deputy CIA director, said waterboarding and other tactics transformed September 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed into a US “consultant” on al Qaida.

Mr Tenet, the director on September 11 2001, said the interrogation programme “saved thousands of Americans lives” while the country faced a “ticking time bomb every day”.

Former vice president Dick Cheney also said in a Fox News interview that the Senate report “is full of crap”.

He said the CIA’s approach to interrogating terror suspects was necessary after the 9/11 attacks and the people who carried them out were doing their duty.

“We asked the agency to go take steps and put in place programmes that were designed to catch the bastards who killed 3,000 of us on 9/11 and make sure it didn’t happen again, and that’s exactly what they did, and they deserve a lot of credit, not the condemnation they are receiving from the Senate Democrats,” he said.

Former top CIA officials published a website – – pointing out decade-old statements from senators Dianne Feinstein and Jay Rockefeller in apparent support of agency efforts. The two Democrats spearheaded the investigation.

The intelligence committee’s Republicans issued their own 167-page “minority” report and said the Democratic analysis was flawed, dishonest and, at 40 million US dollars (£25 million), a waste of taxpayer money.

Ms Feinstein’s office said most of the cost was incurred by the CIA in trying to hide its record.

If the sides agreed on one thing, it was that the CIA suffered significant mismanagement problems early on. The agency and its Republican supporters said those failings were corrected.

“We have learned from these mistakes,” current CIA director John Brennan said.

Mr Bush approved the programme through a covert finding in 2002 but was not briefed by the CIA on the details until 2006, the Senate report said.

President Barack Obama banned harsh interrogation tactics upon taking office, calling the treatment “torture”.

But he has shown little interest in holding accountable anyone involved, a sore point among human rights groups and his supporters on the left.

Lawyers representing former CIA detainees have introduced cases in Europe and Canada, though to little success thus far. Undeclared prisons existed in Poland, Romania and Lithuania, among other countries.

Twenty-six Americans, mostly CIA agents, were convicted in absentia in Italy of kidnapping a Muslim cleric in Milan in 2003, limiting their ability to travel for fear of extradition. The former CIA base chief in Italy was briefly detained in Panama last year before being returned to the US.

Published: Thursday 11th December 2014 by The News Editor

Comments (0)

Local business search