Published: Friday 1st January 2016 by The News Editor
Saudi Arabia carried out at least 157 executions in 2015, with beheadings reaching their highest level in the kingdom in two decades, according to advocacy groups.
Coinciding with the rise in executions is the number of people executed for non-lethal offences that judges have wide discretion to rule on, particularly for drug-related crimes.
Rights group Amnesty International said in November that at least 63 people had been executed since the start of the year for drug-related offences.
That figure made for at least 40% of the total number of executions in 2015, compared to less than 4% for drug-related executions in 2010.
Amnesty said Saudi Arabia had exceeded its highest level of executions since 1995, when 192 executions were recorded.
But while most crimes, such as premeditated murder, may carry fixed punishments under Saudi Arabia’s interpretation of the Islamic law, or Sharia, drug-related offences are considered “ta’zir”, meaning neither the crime nor the punishment is defined in Islam.
Discretionary judgments for “ta’zir” crimes have led to arbitrary rulings with contentious outcomes.
In a lengthy report issued in August, Amnesty International noted the case of Lafi al-Shammari, a Saudi national with no previous criminal record who was executed in mid-2015 for drug trafficking. The person arrested with him and charged with the same offences received a 10-year prison sentence, despite having prior arrests related to drug trafficking.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) found that of the first 100 prisoners executed in 2015, 56 had been based on judicial discretion and not for crimes for which Islamic law mandates a specific death penalty punishment.
Sharia scholars hold vastly different views on the application of the death penalty, particularly for cases of “ta’zir”.
Delphine Lourtau, research director at Cornell Law School’s Death Penalty Worldwide, adds that there are Sharia law experts “whose views are that procedural safeguards surrounding capital punishment are so stringent that they make death penalty almost virtually impossible”.
She said in Saudi Arabia, defendants are not provided defence lawyers and in numerous cases of South Asians arrested for drug trafficking, they are not provided translators in court hearings.
There are also questions “over the degree of influence the executive has on trial outcomes” when it comes to cases where Shiite activists are sentenced to death, she added.
Emory Law professor and Sharia scholar Abdullahi An-Naim said because there is an “inherent infallibility in court systems”, no judicial system can claim to enforce an immutable, infallible form of Sharia.
“There is a gap between what Islam is and what Islam is as understood by human beings,” he said. “Sharia was never intended to be coercively applied by the state.”
Similar to how the US Constitution is seen as a living document with interpretations that have expanded over the years, more so is the Koran, which serves as a cornerstone of Sharia, he said. The other half to Sharia is the judgments carried out by the Prophet Mohammed. Virtually anything else becomes an interpretation of Sharia and not Sharia itself, Mr An-Naim said.
Of Islam’s four major schools of thought, the underpinning of Saudi Arabia’s legal system is based on the most conservative Hanbali branch and an ideology widely known as Wahhabism.
A 2005 royal decree issued in Saudi Arabia to combat narcotics further codified the right of judges to issue execution sentences “as a discretionary penalty” against any person found guilty of smuggling, receiving, or manufacturing drugs.
HRW’s Middle East researcher Adam Coolge says Saudi Arabia executed 158 people in total in 2015 compared to 90 the year before.
Catherine Higham, a caseworker for Reprieve, which works against the death penalty worldwide, says her organisation documented 157 executions in the kingdom. Saudi Arabia does not release annual tallies, though it does announce individual executions in state media throughout the year.
Saudi law allows for execution in cases of murder, drug offences and rape. Though seldom carried out, the death penalty also applies to adultery, apostasy and witchcraft.
In defence of how Saudi Arabia applies Sharia, the kingdom’s representative to the UN Human Rights Council, Bandar al-Aiban, said in an address in Geneva in March that capital punishment applies “only (to) those who commit heinous crimes that threaten security”.
Because Saudi Arabia carries out most executions through beheading and sometimes in public, it has been compared to Islamic State, which also carries out public beheadings and claims to be implementing Sharia.
Saudi Arabia strongly rejects this. In December, foreign minister Adel al-Jubeir told reporters in Paris “it’s easy to say Wahhabism equals Daesh equals terrorism, which is not true”. Daesh is the Arabic acronym for the IS group.
Unlike the extrajudicial beheadings IS carries out against hostages and others, the kingdom says its judiciary process requires at least 13 judges at three levels of court to rule in favour of a death sentence before it is carried out. Saudi officials also argue executions are aimed at combating crime.
Even with the kingdom’s record level of executions in 2015, Amnesty International says China, where information about the death penalty is a “state secret”, is believed to execute more individuals that the rest of the world’s figures combined.
Reprieve says that in Iran, more than 1,000 people were executed in 2015. Another organisation called Iran Human Rights, which is based in Oslo, Norway, and closely follows executions, said at least 648 people had been executed in the first six months of 2015 in the Islamic Republic, with more than two-thirds for drug offences.
Reprieve says Pakistan has executed at least 315 people in 2015, after the country lifted a moratorium on executions early last year following a December 2014 Taliban attack on a school that killed 150 people, most of them children. Only a fraction of those executed since then have been people convicted of a terrorist attack.
Published: Friday 1st January 2016 by The News Editor